No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Naming Convention | |||
I have a suggestion regarding naming conventions on the wiki. A lot of the common terms are going to overlap, and currently the convention seems to be <nowiki><term>(<game>)</nowiki>, which seems both ugly and nonstandard. Why not use the given convention in MediaWiki (which is <nowiki><game>:<term></nowiki>), or another convention (like how MoinMoin does it, as <nowiki><game>/<term></nowiki>, which parses cleaner in non-wiki use.) | I have a suggestion regarding naming conventions on the wiki. A lot of the common terms are going to overlap, and currently the convention seems to be <nowiki><term>(<game>)</nowiki>, which seems both ugly and nonstandard. Why not use the given convention in MediaWiki (which is <nowiki><game>:<term></nowiki>), or another convention (like how MoinMoin does it, as <nowiki><game>/<term></nowiki>, which parses cleaner in non-wiki use.) | ||
[[User:Dipstick|Dipstick]] | [[User:Dipstick|Dipstick]] | ||
I'm a little confused as to what you're referring to. The only pages I see in the form <nowiki><term>(<game>)</nowiki> are the character pages. In which case, I'm sure it doesn't really matter if you change it to: <nowiki><game>:<term></nowiki>. | |||
--[[User:James McCloud|James McCloud]] 19:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:20, 18 December 2006
Naming Convention
I have a suggestion regarding naming conventions on the wiki. A lot of the common terms are going to overlap, and currently the convention seems to be <term>(<game>), which seems both ugly and nonstandard. Why not use the given convention in MediaWiki (which is <game>:<term>), or another convention (like how MoinMoin does it, as <game>/<term>, which parses cleaner in non-wiki use.)
I'm a little confused as to what you're referring to. The only pages I see in the form <term>(<game>) are the character pages. In which case, I'm sure it doesn't really matter if you change it to: <game>:<term>.
--James McCloud 19:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)